Out of 76,984 who responded, 79% were in favor, 5% opposed, and 16% undecided." "On July 29th 2005, Fox News ran a poll asking if child pornography should be treated as art and therefore legalized. legislation? I could write it myself, but my english is not as good as it seems.
Maybe one of you would like to write a section about child pornography in E.U. This decision define a "child" as a person under the age of 18 and "child pornography" as a real child or a real person appearing to be a child or a realistic image of a non-existent child engaged in a sexual explicit conduct.Īs all Council decisions, this one is binding. Since January 20, 2006, Council Decision 2004/68/JHA apply in all 25 member states. I seriously question the motive's of whoever added the keywords.
Judicial consent movie torrent download how to#
To me it just looked like an advert on how to access child porn, needless to say I deleted the keywords, although I imagine when I come to re-read the article the keywords will be back in place. I could not beleive it when I came across examples of keywords while reading this article. I completely agree with the first comment and as for the second comment, so what if Paedophiles would find other ways of accessing child porn, theres no need to make it easier for them by displaying keywords. I agree that this information could aid criminal actions, but those who would perform them would know/find other sources for the information. One legitimate example I can think of is in order to filter these keywords in one way or another, from traffic through ones site or from search results (for example, while searching for legitimate/legal pornography, avoiding things that include these keywords). The above was written by me Timothy J Scriven 09:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC), sorry I did not sign my name the first time but I wasn't aware of the procedures and didn't have an account. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.236.25.84 ( talk Wikipedia should be an ethical encylopedia and make child porn legal!!Īnd there is more to that than simply not breaking the law. Should we really have examples of "keywords" while they may not be illegial to have on the page they could aid in committing a crime and it seems to serve no legitimate purpose to have examples. I think this is a pretty clear case of POV and I cannot understand why it was not picked up earlier. I'm going to change dubious to controversial since it's clear that it's POV to call these statistics dubious. "In late 1970s, using dubious statistics"
22 Dutch police investigate Google Adwords Suggestion Tools.12 Ukranian ring, a trove of information.8 A Rational Approach to Defining Child Porn (at last!).7 Economic factors for voluntary child porn.6 United Nations Conference fails to define child pornography.5 Computer-generated child porn advancing the art of computer rendering?.
0 kommentar(er)
